Windows Support Chat

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Big Blue’s Lotus sandbox blues? Give us back our biscuits!

Posted on 20:56 by Unknown

Add to the list of unfathomable corporate decisions IBM’s recent making unavailable the much-loved Lotus Sandbox archive, see here, please go read it.

I do refer to the Sandbox several times per year but haven’t visited for a month or two, and was only alerted to this sad action by Thierry Cayla’s R.I.P posting and I agree with him that it’s not one of IBM’s smartest moves.

So I sent of the following via the developerWorks feedback link on the Sandbox page and maybe you’ll consider doing so too if you’d like to see the Sandbox archive revived.

Here’s my developerWorks feedback to IBM (why not have a go yourself?) …

Bring back the Lotus Sandbox. There were still valuable downloads on it that aren't available elsewhere (such as OpenNTF.org). Consequently  decommissioning the Sandbox will prove to be a disservice to the Lotus Notes/Domino community. Even if you don't actively maintain but merely leave it there as a "legacy" resource, it will remain of value to the Notes community. Could you not afford the trivial expense of leaving it there? Surely your budget is not so constrained that you can't afford the disk space and download bandwidth?
- - - - - - - - - - -

With the boilerplate response: Thank you for giving developerWorks your feedback. Your comments give developerWorks important information that we will use to further improve our design.

Time will tell if they do anything positive about this unimpressive decision.

This reminds me a bit of IBM Australia’s decision, back around  1989 or 1990 -- when admittedly the economy was getting a bit tough, and the usual aggressive annual sales growth targets were being missed -- to stop supplying free biscuits (cookies, if you prefer) in the IBM coffee rooms across the nation. Rumour had it that the biscuits were costing IBM Australia the not inconsiderable amount of some $150,000 per annum (or maybe it was $250,000), so it was probably an understandable decision for the times.

But I can’t see how merely keeping online the Lotus Sandbox could be imposing any such unbearable cost on IBM Corporation.

So IBM,  please reconsider, and make available again the “knowledge biscuits” stored in the Lotus Sandbox.

Technorati Tags: IBM,Lotus Sandbox,Bad decisions
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

Categories

  • Add-ons
  • Adobe Reader
  • AJAX
  • Application Platform
  • Architecture
  • AS/400
  • Asia
  • Australia
  • Bad Software
  • Browser
  • Browser Share
  • Bug
  • Bushfire
  • Business
  • Chemistry
  • China
  • Coding
  • Communication
  • Communities of Interest
  • Crossword
  • Crosswords
  • Curiosity
  • Device Drivers
  • DLL hell
  • Documentation
  • Dragon
  • Durian
  • Ecosystems
  • Error Messages
  • Eudora
  • Extensions
  • Facetiousness
  • Failure
  • Firefox
  • FOSS
  • Freelance
  • Freeware
  • Fun
  • Heat Wave
  • Humor
  • i Series
  • IBM
  • IBM Systems
  • IE
  • Image resource manipulation
  • Innovation
  • Installation
  • Internet Explorer
  • Intranet
  • Japan
  • Koala
  • Linux
  • Live Writer
  • Lotus Domino
  • Lotus Notes
  • Lotus Notes Lotus Domino
  • Lotus Software
  • LotusScript
  • Mainframe
  • Melbourne (Australia)
  • Microsoft
  • Multiple
  • Natural Disaster
  • NaturallySpeaking
  • Nigerian 419 fraud
  • Notes Mail
  • NotesTracker
  • Nuance
  • Open Source
  • OpenNTF.ORG
  • Patents
  • POSS
  • PowerPoint
  • Pragmatism
  • Presenter
  • Print Server
  • Project Management
  • Pronunciation
  • Proprietary
  • Registry
  • Releases
  • Research and Development
  • RIA
  • SDMS
  • Security
  • Service Oriented Architecture
  • SNA
  • SOA
  • Software
  • Software Package
  • speech recognition
  • Spell Checking
  • Standards
  • System i
  • System/38
  • TCP/IP
  • Technology
  • Usability
  • Usability Testing
  • Versions
  • Victoria
  • Weather
  • Web 2.0
  • Web 3.0
  • Web Design
  • Web Pi
  • Web Services
  • Webshots.com
  • Windows
  • Windows 7 backgrounds
  • Words
  • z Series

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (25)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
  • ►  2012 (25)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2011 (20)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ▼  2010 (69)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ▼  September (5)
      • The Lotus Sandbox is available again, with bananas
      • Big Blue’s Lotus sandbox blues? Give us back our b...
      • Help me, concerning the Lotus Domino Designer 8.5....
      • Is there an offline version of The Lotus XPages Do...
      • A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Installing Lo...
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2009 (41)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2008 (16)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (39)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2006 (98)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2005 (38)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile